Dimensions in Graphical Representation: 10 Quotes
“Graphic comparisons, wherever possible, should be made in one dimension only.” (Willard C Brinton, “Graphic Methods for Presenting Facts”, 1919)
“Readers of statistical diagrams should not be required to compare magnitudes in more than one dimension. Visual comparisons of areas are particularly inaccurate and should not be necessary in reading any statistical graphical diagram.” (William C Marshall, “Graphical methods for schools, colleges, statisticians, engineers and executives”, 1921)
“We envision information in order to reason about, communicate, document, and preserve that knowledge — activities nearly always carried out on two-dimensional paper and computer screen. Escaping this flatland and enriching the density of data displays are the essential tasks of information design.” (Edward R Tufte, “Envisioning Information”, 1990)
“Fitting is essential to visualizing hypervariate data. The structure of data in many dimensions can be exceedingly complex. The visualization of a fit to hypervariate data, by reducing the amount of noise, can often lead to more insight. The fit is a hypervariate surface, a function of three or more variables. As with bivariate and trivariate data, our fitting tools are loess and parametric fitting by least-squares. And each tool can employ bisquare iterations to produce robust estimates when outliers or other forms of leptokurtosis are present.” (William S Cleveland, “Visualizing Data”, 1993)
“The visual representation of a scale — an axis with ticks — looks like a ladder. Scales are the types of functions we use to map varsets to dimensions. At first glance, it would seem that constructing a scale is simply a matter of selecting a range for our numbers and intervals to mark ticks. There is more involved, however. Scales measure the contents of a frame. They determine how we perceive the size, shape, and location of graphics. Choosing a scale (even a default decimal interval scale) requires us to think about what we are measuring and the meaning of our measurements. Ultimately, that choice determines how we interpret a graphic.” (Leland Wilkinson, “The Grammar of Graphics” 2nd Ed., 2005)
“Using colour, itʼs possible to increase the density of information even further. A single colour can be used to represent two variables simultaneously. The difficulty, however, is that there is a limited amount of information that can be packed into colour without confusion.” (Brian Suda, “A Practical Guide to Designing with Data”, 2010)
“Bear in mind is that the use of color doesn’t always help. Use it sparingly and with a specific purpose in mind. Remember that the reader’s brain is looking for patterns, and will expect both recurrence itself and the absence of expected recurrence to carry meaning. If you’re using color to differentiate categorical data, then you need to let the reader know what the categories are. If the dimension of data you’re encoding isn’t significant enough to your message to be labeled or explained in some way — or if there is no dimension to the data underlying your use of difference colors — then you should limit your use so as not to confuse the reader.” (Noah Iliinsky & Julie Steel, “Designing Data Visualizations”, 2011)
“Explanatory data visualization is about conveying information to a reader in a way that is based around a specific and focused narrative. It requires a designer-driven, editorial approach to synthesize the requirements of your target audience with the key insights and most important analytical dimensions you are wishing to convey.” (Andy Kirk, “Data Visualization: A successful design process”, 2012)
“Color is difficult to use effectively. A small number of well-chosen colors can be highly distinguishable, particularly for categorical data, but it can be difficult for users to distinguish between more than a handful of colors in a visualization. Nonetheless, color is an invaluable tool in the visualization toolbox because it is a channel that can carry a great deal of meaning and be overlaid on other dimensions. […] There are a variety of perceptual effects, such as simultaneous contrast and color deficiencies, that make precise numerical judgments about a color scale difficult, if not impossible.” (Danyel Fisher & Miriah Meyer, “Making Data Visual”, 2018)
“Maps also have the disadvantage that they consume the most powerful encoding channels in the visualization toolbox — position and size — on an aspect that is held constant. This leaves less effective encoding channels like color for showing the dimension of interest.” (Danyel Fisher & Miriah Meyer, “Making Data Visual”, 2018)
More quotes on “Dimensions” in Graphical Representation at sql-troubles.blogspot.com.
